A comparison between Aryaka and WAN accelerators
Aryaka – examples for network performance improvement
Percentage performance improvement with Aryaka:
| Application | Improvement percentage | Conditions | Downloading a PDF document |
|---|---|---|---|
| RDP | 91% | 11 MB file over T1 with 300 ms latency RTT | Aryaka_RDP-R_PB1.pdf |
| FTP file transfer | 90% | 11 MB file over T1 with 300 ms latency RTT | Aryaka_FTP_PB1.pdf |
| HTTP transfer uncompressed | 84% | 11 MB file over T1 with 300 ms latency RTT | |
| HTTP transfer compressed | 93% | 11 MB file over T1 with 300 ms latency RTT | Aryaka_HTTP_PB1.pdf |
* Results may change depending on network topology and data type transferred during the examination.
A comparison between Aryaka and box based WAN accelerators:
| Traditional WAN accelerators | Aryaka | |
|---|---|---|
| 99.999% guaranteed performance level, backed by QoS and SLA. No | No | Yes |
| Requires high initial investment in boxes per site | Yes | No |
| Requires purchasing expensive infrastructures such as MPLS | Yes | No |
| Responsibility for maintenance and regular updates of equipment | Yes | No |
| Problems with equipment becoming old | Yes | No |
| Continuous and simple upgrades | No | Yes |
| Full flexibility in various services and their level | No | Yes |
| Easy and simple removal and addition of sites | No | Yes |
| Commitment to a communication provider | Yes | No |
| Payment by monthly subscription | No | Yes |
For more information, please contact us in any of the following channels and we will contact you soon:
